I am always very surprised to see and hear that there are still some lawyers, judges, CIOs and other officers who don’t know what Electronic Discovery is. Actually, this is not true. I am not surprised, and why would I be about something that we are only forced to learn when we are exposed to it. Most people learn about e-discovery when they are involved in a lawsuit. Why would I be interested in it if I am not involved in a lawsuit? Well, there are 2 reasons: I want to make money from it, which is a very good . . . [more]
There’s an interesting small piece on the Legal Technology section of Law.com that treats the issue of whether and when social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace are discoverable, and if so, when admissable as evidence. “Are Social Networking Sites Discoverable?“, by Ronald J. Levine and Susan L. Swatski-Lebson, deals principally with privacy and a party’s reasonable expectation of it, typically as an employee in a corporate setting.
On Monday, November 17, 2008 Dr. Colin J. Bennett, Professor in the Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, will be speaking at the Faculty of Information, University of Toronto about identity cards in Canada. Details here and in the full press release below the fold. . . . [more]
For my must read of the week, I recommend FEED: The Razorfish Consumer Experience Report . Came across it yesterday.
Its stated mission is to help people to gain a better understanding of how technology affects today’s digital consumer experience and explore the emerging trends that will shape those experiences for years to come. It talks about the rise of search as a primary mode of navigation, the widespread adoption of Web 2.0 features and technologies, and how the increase in mainstream social media usage have fundamentally altered the consumer landscape. The main point is that for brands to remain . . . [more]
I attended an American Association of Law Libraries webinar on screencasting and podcasting this week. I heard about this session via Slaw and decided to attend to see if this tech would fit in nicely with our current Intranet offerings.
Kerry Fitz-Gerald, Reference Librarian, Seattle University School of Law Library and Rita Kaiser, Reference Services Librarian, King County Law Library educated and inspired me. The session was just over an hour, and due to my longitunal location ran from 11 a.m. to 12ish.
I was so inspired, I bought a headset with a mic at lunch, and proceeded to avoid . . . [more]
I doubt that this is much of a surprise to the law library community. US New and World Report has discovered that special librarianship is a great career choice for those who enjoy watching politics. I can’t imagine doing this job without some interest in and knowledge of the machinery of government and the workings of the political process!
Other jobs mentioned in the article: lobbyist, tour guide, reporter, translator/interpreter, journalist. Folks, I think we picked the right one (although journalism wouldn’t be bad…)
If you weren’t following your current career, what would you do?
According to an article in legalweek.com DLA Piper, the Anglo-American giant law firm, has held talks with Fasken Martineau about a potential link between or merger of the firms. DLA Piper has more than 3,700 lawyers in offices in 38 countries, but has no office in Canada. The article also says that DLA Piper is considering, alternatively, opening up an independent office here. Fasken reportedly has said that they may be prepared to talk in January.
An irrelevant coda: DLA Piper uses gangbuster rotating images on its main website page, quite unlike the usual staid graphics found on law . . . [more]
Google introduced a really clever website over the last few days. Although they’re always getting flak for all the personal info they gather from you, there really are some pretty interesting things they can do with all that information. Like make the Centre for Disease Control obsolete.
OK, maybe that’s a bit too hyperbolic, but their new program has managed to closely approximate the CDC’s tracking of flu bugs, simply through aggregating all the web searches people do on the topic. Apparently the number of people who google “Neo Citran” or other similar terms gives you a great idea . . . [more]
Although both of the Canadian tools below have been available for some time now, I have only recently started to experiment with them.
Both products – which are free but which each require subscriptions/passwords – will “auto-populate” your research memos with hypertext links to the cases cited in your memo.
The Quicklaw product is Auto Link which will add hypertext links to the Quicklaw version of cases cited in your memo (it allows you to do this in bulk, that is, with more than one memo at a time). Related to this product on the same page is downloadable software . . . [more]
I have a thing for government documents. “GovDocs” was my best class in library school.
I have a particular thing for UN documents because the UN deals with just about anything and everything.
Here are a few recent ones:
- Our World 2.0: the United Nations University (yes, they have their own university) launched a webzine this past summer about solutions for the planet’s climate, oil and food security messes
- Toolkit to Combat Human Trafficking: the UN Office on Drugs and Crime has developed a “toolkit” that provides guidance to policymakers, law enforcers, judges, prosecutors, and victim service providers
On average, we’re still seeing 1-2 new blogs each month, including Canadian lawyers, students, librarians, and other legal pros. And for your surfing pleasure, those latest blogs are:
- Innovate Hamliton (Michele Ballagh)
- Megawatt: The BC Renewable Energy Blog (Clark Wilson LLP)
- Official Clio Blog – Legal Practice Management SaaS (Themis Solutions)
- IPilogue (Osgoode)
- The Employment and Labour Law Students Society Blog (York)
- Law Library News from John A.
Researchers from the University of California, Berkeley and UC, San Diego have published a paper on a study they did on spam.
They actually took over part of an existing spam botnet, and sent their own spam to test the response. We all wonder why anyone would actually fall for the scam, and know that the uptake must be low – but how low?
In their case, 350 million emails sent resulted in 28 “sales” – a response rate of 0.00001%.
Commentary ranges from the thought that the rewards for spammers are decreasing to math showing how lucrative it can . . . [more]