Section 12 of the Copyright Act gives the Crown copyright in any work “prepared or published by or under the direction or control of Her Majesty or any government department…” This broad sweep is considered, by the federal and provincial governments at least, to include court and tribunal judgments and legislation. The issue of whether this is appropriate or not has been somewhat finessed (albeit in a question-begging way) so far as federal legal material goes by the 1998 Reproduction of Federal Law Order SI/97-5 providing that:

Anyone may, without charge or request for permission, reproduce enactments and consolidations of

. . . [more]

In a previous column, we described the Canadian Forum on Civil Justice’s Inventory of Reforms, a freely accessible, online database that contains descriptions of civil justice system reform initiatives from across Canada. The importance of this information is not only in letting people within a jurisdiction know what is changing, but also letting all jurisdictions across the country see what is being tried elsewhere. The natural extension of this is the ability to identify the most effective reforms so that they can be highlighted and applied elsewhere, though this function is naturally the most challenging to put into . . . [more]

As part of its series of guidelines to supplement the CBA Code of Professional Conduct, the Ethics and Professional Responsibility Committee has published a document that has seventeen solicitor-client privilege and client confidentiality FAQs.

Lawyers have a duty, as is expressed in the various provincial rules of conduct, to hold client information in strict confidence, except as authorized by the client, required by law, or otherwise required by the rules. The duty of confidentiality is distinguished from the common law rule of solicitor-client privilege with respect to oral or written communications between client and lawyer. The duty of confidentiality is . . . [more]

The comment period for the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20’s issues paper on “Client Confidentiality and Lawyers’ Use of Technology” closes on December 15th. The Commission is soliciting feedback from all corners, but would particularly like to gather feedback from practicing attorneys. The scope of the issues raised by the paper is broad:

1. Form of the Commission’s conclusions. The commission is soliciting feedback on how to best release its findings: a white paper, legal technology resource site, or possibly a change to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
2. Best Practices. What “best practices” exist for the

. . . [more]

The Parliamentary Information and Research Service has published a brief report entitled “The Stuxnet Worm: Just Another Computer Attack or a Game Changer?” [PDF, HTML] by Holly Porteous. As most Slaw readers may know, this malicious software, spreading throughout the world, is aimed at disrupting or controlling certain industrial processes that are regulated by computers. The sophistication of the worm and the speculation that it was targeted at Iran’s nuclear facilities have raised concern and commentary about malware to a new level.

This report is a valuable overview, addressing briefly the manner in which Stuxnet was launched . . . [more]

Last week I talked about two announcements from Stem Legal: the newly relaunched Canadian Law Blogs directory site Lawblogs.ca and the 2010 Canadian Law Blog Awards a.k.a. the CLawBies now open for nominations. A third announcement came out at the same time which we haven’t yet mentioned: a new URL shortener for the Canadian legal industry, Lawlks.ca (pronounced “Law Likes”).

Stem is primarily using it to track content being shared from Lawblogs.ca site. Steve Matthews says in the announcement on the Law Firm Web Strategy blog:

The idea is to track which Canadian legal content pieces are getting

. . . [more]

Acquisitions and mergers are expected to continue as the major legal publishers explore ways to increase their profitability, achieve growth and increase market share. When organic growth fails to achieve corporate expectations, acquisitions and mergers are the next best thing.

The acquisition of Canada Law Book by Carswell Thomson is simply the most recent acquisition of note in the Canadian market. There have been many others of far greater significance in recent years, including the acquisition of Yvon Blais by Carswell, the acquisition of Quicklaw by Lexis Nexis and the re-acquisition of Irwin Law from Quicklaw by its founders.

Long . . . [more]

Whether you like Julian Assange, hate him, or altogether are indifferent towards him, the reality is that the WikiLeaks phenomenon is here to stay.

Even as Assange is moved to isolation in his London, England prison on unrelated charges, protesters around the world call for his release. The real news this weekend is the launch of a new website tomorrow, OpenLeaks, by a former WikiLeaks employee. OpenLeaks will differ from Wikileaks in that it will allow anonymous users to upload information, which will then be released to media agents who can filter through it.

OpenLeaks will not release the information . . . [more]

Young Mr. Byron Bennett sells chocolate. He has an elaborate shop in Manhattan offering 36 brands of the luxurious substance, hailing from ten countries. He also believes in order, so his chocolates are ranged on shelves with careful precision as to type and origin. To reflect this combination of succulence and seriousness he named his shop The Chocolate Library. It would seem to be a sensible and harmonious marriage…

…to everyone, that is, except the New York State Education Department.

What, you might ask, does a department of education have to do with a chocolate shop? The answer makes about . . . [more]

I’ve been giving some thought to patent law since Simon Chester posted “Appeal Granted by Federal Court for Amazon.com 1-Click Patent Application” (Slaw: October 14, 2010). The case is Amazon.com, Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2010 FC 1011 (CanLII). I had a look at the case, thinking it would be interesting to see how Amazon had done the 1-click thing. I was disappointed. I got the distinct impression that the judge (Michael L. Phelan) knew even less than I do about what programming for the web involves. My brief comment was sort of an invitation to others . . . [more]

How far is too far? How far should the state go in proscribing citizen's behaviour?

OneLook… the one dictionary to find it all.