Articling Debate Exposes Convocation’s Flaws
Today the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) once again considered the issue of what to do with articling in Ontario.
Once again, the matter was webcast so that all could see the debate.
Once again, viewers were shocked by what they saw.
Once again, Benchers came across as clubby and out-of-touch.
Time and again, they stood up and made verbose, rambling arguments based on nothing more than anecdotes, personal experience and emotional pleas.
Given that most are litigators, it’s astounding that so many do not understand how to make brief, pithy remarks; they’ve clearly been trained (perhaps during articling) . . . [more]
