Archive for November, 2013
Summaries Sunday: Maritime Law Book
Summaries Sunday: Supreme Advocacy
The Friday Fillip: Singing a Different Tune
Back in the day some important numbers in music were 78, 33 1/3, and 45. Now, of course, numbers just don’t enter into it — the “it” being the speed at which data is lifted off a medium: “faster” (cousin to “more”) is the only watchword, as numbers exponent (should be a real verb) beyond our understanding.
(An interesting sidelight: I always thought these numbers represented technological progress or something akin to that. Turns out that, like so much else, they were simply fabrications born of capitalist competition, designed to dupe the rubes. And for a forehead-slapping “Doh!” incident, I . . . [more]
The Promise of Labour Arbitration: Delayed but Not Forgotten
There has been a much-needed recent focus on the state of the civil litigation process in Canada. Of course, the courts are only a small (albeit vital) part of our system of justice. In fact, a majority of people in Canada will have little, if any, direct contact with the courts; they are more likely to encounter various aspects of the administrative justice system in disputes with neighbours, in their workplace and with governments. In this column, I will focus on the justice system for unionized employees – the labour arbitration process.
Labour arbitration was introduced as part of the . . . [more]
Are Reports to the Police Protected From Defamation Suits?
US Court Dismisses Copyright Lawsuit Against Google Books Project
Judge Denny Chin of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York today dismissed the copyright violation lawsuit that US author groups had launched against Google.
The search giant has been digitizing tens of millions of books to create a massive online library / bookstore but the project was opposed in a lawsuit by US publishers and author organizations that started in 2005. The publishers’ group split off and settled earlier.
The judge wrote that the ambitious project respects authors’ rights and is a case of “fair use” (equivalent to fair dealing in Canadian copyright . . . [more]
Buying Personal Information in Bulk: Not So Fast!
An attempt by a Canadian online dating service, Plenty of Fish, to buy the database of a bankrupt competitor has run aground on privacy considerations (in Texas, of all places).
This has echoes of a situation a decade ago where the database of a toy company was going to be acquired. My recollection (subject to correction by Slaw readers) is that the purchase was derailed by public outcry more than by operation of law.
How would you go about making sure that your clients’ databases of personal information are saleable assets – or can this be done in Canada (or . . . [more]
Moral Superiority
Is the exclusion of “non-lawyers” from ownership of law firms simply a relic of the belief in lawyers’ superior morals? And is lawyers’ professionalism dependent on that particular organizational structure?
Those were questions raised in Tuesday night’s wide-ranging Twitterchat hosted by Monica Goyal, a partner in Aluvion Law and a member of the CBA Legal Futures Initiative’s Innovation and Business Structures team.
One of the most frequent objections to the idea of changing the current regulations regarding the ownership of law firms is the purported impact this will have on the professionalism of those involved.
“Is the reservation to diversifying . . . [more]
Bill Affirming the Values of Secularism and Religious Neutrality of the State Tabled in Quebec Legislature
The Unbearable Uselessness of Progress Reports
No one loves progress (status) reports. They take time to write. The writers believe they’re unread.[1] And as one wag put it, they mostly demonstrate the lack of progress.
The problem with these reports is twofold. One aspect, of course, is that the intended recipients are busy. The other is that the reports contain little to no information the recipient can act on, other than perhaps taking frustrations out on the project team.
Consider the sign pictured here, on one of the floating bridges across the lake into Seattle. It tells me what I’m about to be charged for . . . [more]
Thursday Thinkpiece: Pickett on Choice of Forum in Cross-Border Torts
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. In every case the proper permissions have been obtained. If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site’s contact form.
Cross-Border Torts: Canadian-US Litigation Strategies
Wyatt Pickett
Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2013
[Footnotes omitted.]
§3.1 If I could reduce the message of this book to one simple axiom, it would be this: “If you can bring your client’s action in more than one jurisdiction, you should bring that action in the forum whose substantive . . . [more]
