Canada’s online legal magazine.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario: Access to Justice Denied

November 12, 2024
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario: Access to Justice Denied

Reposted with permission.
Original Post:
Kathy Laird and Lorne Slotnick, “The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario: Access to Justice Denied” (Tribunal Watch Ontario, November 12, 2024), online: https://tribunalwatch.ca/2024/the-human-rights-tribunal-of-ontario-access-to-justice-denied/

Quick Summary

Ontario’s human rights system has become a nightmare for people who seek redress for alleged discrimination, a new analysis by the independent group Tribunal Watch Ontario shows.

The latest statistics from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) show that the tribunal has become the place where human rights claims go to die. Tribunal Watch’s analysis, largely . . . [more]

Posted in: Justice Issues

Wednesday: What’s Hot on CanLII? – October 2024

Each month, we tell you which three English-language cases and French-language cases have been the most viewed* on CanLII in the previous month and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about.

For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were:

  1. Subar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 340 (également disponible en français ici)

[1] The Applicant is a 68-year old citizen of Israel, who first visited Canada in 1989. He has worked as a cantor (leading liturgy and prayer) within Ottawa’s Jewish community at various points since 2003, and continuously in . . . [more]

Posted in: Wednesday: What's Hot on CanLII

Regulation on the Rocks: Why Canada’s First AI Law Looks Likely to Fail

Introduction

In June of 2022, the Government of Canada tabled Bill C-27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act,[1] making it one of the earlier countries in the world to commence work on a national level Artificial Intelligence (AI) regulatory framework. Unfortunately, due to a complex array of factors—including criticisms of its scope, legislative delays and political instability—the bill now faces a significant risk of failure.

Bill C-27 is an omnibus bill that contains three pieces of legislation including the Consumer Privacy Protection Act (CPPA), the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal Act (PIDPA) and the Artificial Intelligence Data Act . . . [more]

Posted in: Legal Technology

Good Communications: Don’t Forget Generational Considerations

In November, I’m presenting to law students about plain language and the importance of good communication. As always when preparing for a presentation, my first consideration is ‘who is my audience’ and ‘how best can I deliver my message to this audience’. In this circumstance, who my audience is and the impact on their communications has become the message.

The majority of these students will be in their mid to late 20s: Millennials on the upper end and Generation Z on the lower end. In the 20 years since I graduated with my fellow Gen Xers, communication channels, styles, preferences . . . [more]

Posted in: Legal Information, Legal Marketing, Practice of Law

Monday’s Mix

Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award­-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible.

This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. Hull & Hull Blog 2. SOQUIJ | Le Blogue 3. Administrative Law Matters 4. Canadian Securities Law 5. Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada

Hull & Hull Blog
Avoiding Will Disputes: How Drafting Lawyers Protect Your Intentions

In recent posts, I’ve emphasized the importance of working

. . . [more]
Posted in: Monday’s Mix

Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ

Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec.

PÉNAL (DROIT) : Le juge de première instance, qui a imposé une peine de 8 mois d’emprisonnement à l’accusé, dont la conduite dangereuse avait causé la mort d’un motocycliste, a erré en orientant sa décision uniquement en fonction de la conséquence tragique du délit et en évacuant les principes de . . . [more]

Posted in: Summaries Sunday

How Can Unbundling / Legal Coaching Support Clients in Mediation?

Professor John Lande has just published a terrific article “Theory and Practice of Mediation Representation”. He has also posted a summary here. Professor Lande acknowledges that there is much more written about how to mediate (as mediator) than how to represent clients in mediation (as counsel). Given that it is very common for lawyers to support clients in mediation, he gathers the best existing literature on the subject and presents both a theoretical framework for analyzing mediation representation and practical techniques for lawyers to use. There are helpful tables and checklists describing tasks for both lawyers and mediators. . . . [more]

Posted in: Dispute Resolution, Justice Issues

Generative AI: The Awards and the Infringement

The week of October 7th this year was quite something for Artificial Intelligence (AI). It was the object of two consecutive Nobel Prizes, awarded just days apart. The first, in Physics, went to John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton (a British Canadian) for laying the foundations of machine learning. The second in Chemistry, won by Demis Hassabis, John Jumper, and David Baker, was for utilizing AI to predict millions of intricate protein structures that are key to understanding molecular interactions.

In stark contrast to this double triumph are some 20 copyright infringement suits filed against OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Nvidia, . . . [more]

Posted in: Intellectual Property, Legal Publishing

Strategic Growth in the Legal Services Market: What’s Next? How Do We Cope?

“Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.” – Ferris Bueller, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off.

[This is Part One of a two-part series on Strategic Growth in the Legal Services Market and the foundation for the first half of my September 2024 keynote address to the Alberta Civil Trial Lawyers Association in Calgary, Alberta.]

In 2008, a global financial crisis considered the worst since the Great Depression of the 1930s marked the end of the traditional law firm’s 20-year bull run.

Since then, life in the global legal services . . . [more]

Posted in: Legal Marketing, Practice of Law

Nominations for the 2025 Hugh Lawford Award for Excellence in Legal Publishing

CALL/ACBD is accepting nominations for the 2025 Hugh Lawford Award for Excellence in Legal Publishing.

The Canadian Association of Law Libraries has long had an annual award for excellent legal publishing. Some years ago, we renamed the award we present after Queens University Professor Hugh Lawford (1933-2009) to recognize his contributions to legal publishing in Canada. As a group of legal information specialists, our work depends on being able to access and share high-quality legal knowledge.

We value innovation and this award is open to legal content in all information formats.

The award honours a publisher (whether for-profit or . . . [more]

Posted in: Announcements, Legal Information

Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ

Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec.

PÉNAL (DROIT) : La peine totale de 17 ans d’emprisonnement imposée à un homme ayant commis 19 vols qualifiés avec usage d’une fausse arme à feu est manifestement non indiquée; le lien existant entre ces crimes commis sur une courte période de 2 mois aurait dû atténuer l’effet aggravant des . . . [more]

Posted in: Summaries Sunday

Canadian Judicial Council Guidelines on Social Media Use – an Important First Step

The Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) has issued ethical guidelines for judges on the use of social media. These guidelines could be a useful template for updating or expanding codes of ethics for tribunal members. In this column I identify some of the key parts of the guidelines as well as some of the shortcomings.

The CJC defines social media, using the Oxford English Dictionary definition as its foundation:

 … social media is defined as “websites and applications which enable users to [access], create and share content or to participate in social networking.” This definition encompasses a wide variety of tools,

. . . [more]
Posted in: Dispute Resolution, Legal Ethics

3li_EnFr_Wordmark_W

This project has been made possible in part by the Government of Canada | Ce projet a été rendu possible en partie grâce au gouvernement du Canada