Canada’s online legal magazine.

Summaries Sunday: Supreme Advocacy

One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers a weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter, to which you may subscribe. It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from November 23 – December 27, 2024 inclusive.

Appeals

Aboriginal Law: Police Services; Good Faith; Honour of the Crown
Québec (Attorney General) v. Pekuakamiulnuatsh Takuhikan, 2023 FC 267; 2024 SCC 39 (40619)

Although the two main grounds relied upon — good faith and the honour of . . . [more]

Posted in: Summaries Sunday

Monday’s Mix

Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award­-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible.

This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. ABlawg.ca 2. Susannah Tredwell on Slaw 3. À bon droit 4. NSRLP 5. FACL BC Podcast

ABlawg.ca
Shared Accommodation in Alberta: Law for Roommates and Those Sharing Living Space with Their Landlords

Shared accommodation has become increasingly common in Alberta for many reasons, including the unaffordability of

. . . [more]
Posted in: Monday’s Mix

The Law Society Takes Conflicts of Interest Seriously: Knocking on Wood

In “The Lawyer as Friend,” a famous 1976 law review article, Charles Fried proposed that a lawyer should act as a “special-purpose friend” to each of his or her clients. Within the bounds of the retainer, Fried argued, the lawyer must adopt the interests of the client as their own — just as a friend would.

This analogy helps clarify why conflicts of interest are so toxic to lawyer-client relationships. A conflict of interest usually arises because a lawyer’s loyalty to a client is undermined by the their work for other clients, or by the lawyer’s own personal interests. . . . [more]

Posted in: Legal Ethics

Federal Court Reaffirms Jurisdiction of the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board

The Federal Court of Appeal took the occasion of an appeal of the order of the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (the “Board”) that required a patentee to share reports on medicines that were no longer under patent, to reaffirm the jurisdiction of the Board.

Courts have consistently held that the Board’s jurisdiction is limited to patented medicines and does not extend to medicines for which the patent has expired.[1]

The Board ordered Galderma Canada Inc. (“Galderma”) to provide reports on sales for six years after the patent had expired.

Galderma had provided the reports while the medicine was . . . [more]

Posted in: Intellectual Property

Autopsy of a JPEG: What Happened to NFTs?

When was the last time you heard someone talk about NFTs? Was it when Paris Hilton and Jimmy Fallon showed off their Bored Apes on national television back in January of 2022? Or perhaps it was when Donald Trump unveiled his line of NFTs in December 2022. Or maybe, just maybe, you have that one friend who still insists, daily and with unwavering conviction, that NFTs are poised for a triumphant comeback, that the future of art is non-fungible, and that you’re a fool for not mortgaging your home to buy a JPEG of a doge meme. For the rest . . . [more]

Posted in: Intellectual Property, Technology: Internet

Monday’s Mix

Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award­-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible.

This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. Hull & Hull Blog 2. PierreRoy & Associés 3. Le Blogue du CRL 4. Legal Post Blog 5. FACL BC Podcast

Hull & Hull Blog
Must Dependant Support Claims Be Heard in Family Court?

Family law and estate litigation are similar practice areas in many ways; the

. . . [more]
Posted in: Monday’s Mix

Tackling Access to Justice: The Maryland Example

Recently, NSRLP participated in the 2024 National Pro Bono Conference, held in Montreal. The two-day event brought lawyers, academics, community workers and judges together to discuss issues of access to justice – and to identify and share initiatives aimed at tackling the multitude of challenges associated with a lack of access to justice.

In reflecting on that experience, what remains evident is that if we are to take these problems seriously, it is necessary to engage a variety of stakeholders in their resolutions. This requires the cooperation and commitment of government, the profession, the judiciary, those working in access to . . . [more]

Posted in: Justice Issues

Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ

Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec.

PÉNAL (DROIT) : Un ajournement des procédures engagées en vertu de l’article 515 C.Cr. de plus de 3 jours francs sans le consentement du prévenu ne peut, selon l’article 516 (1) C.Cr., être accordé, à moins que le poursuivant n’établisse une «juste cause», au sens de l’article 11 e) de . . . [more]

Posted in: Summaries Sunday

Thumbs Up to Using Visuals in Contracts: How Visuals in Contracts Will Survive Court

For many legal practitioners, the thought of a visual contract is terrifying. Afterall, without all the flowery legalese, how will a court know how to interpret the contract? Except that the traditional approach to contract drafting is changing as drafters increasingly focus on clarity. Clarity can come in many forms: plain, uncomplicated language, white space and the strategic use of informational design like fonts, underlining, and highlighting to illustrate important elements. The hold-up to greater adoption appears to be based on risk and concern about a court’s interpretation, which often means that contracts are written by lawyers for other lawyers . . . [more]

Posted in: Practice of Law

Med-Arb Revisited – Using OMAP (Opt-Out Med-Arb Process) as a Process Option

Since the publication of the ADR Institute of Canada’s Med-Arb Rules in 2020, Med-Arb has become much more widely accepted as an integrated dispute resolution process in Ontario. Despite this many counsel and parties still have a significant degree of resistance to its use. In the best-known form of med-arb, a single neutral acts as both mediator and arbitrator. The process only transitions into arbitration if the mediation fails; in that case, the med-arbitrator conducts the arbitration and issues a binding decision.

This process offers time and cost efficiencies over stand alone mediation and arbitration and guarantees an outcome, it . . . [more]

Posted in: Dispute Resolution

We Should All Be Teaching Comparative Law Now More Than Ever

If you glance at the news, it feels as if the world is on fire—both literally and figuratively. Climate change wreaks havoc across continents, pandemics challenge our healthcare systems, wars and conflicts displace millions, and the erosion of democratic principles shakes trust in institutions worldwide. At the same time, misinformation spreads faster than facts, nationalism competes with global cooperation, and the international community often seems paralyzed by political gridlock.

In this whirlwind of challenges, one thing is clear: we need legal minds who can think globally and act locally. That’s why I believe we should all be teaching Comparative Law, . . . [more]

Posted in: Legal Information

Placing LEAF’s Report “What It Takes” in Context: Part 2

    PREFACE

This is the second part of a post placing LEAF’s recent report, What It Takes: Establishing a Gender-Based Violence Accountability Mechanism in Canada (“What It Takes” or “LEAF report)” on gender-based violence (GBV) in the context of historical efforts to address GBV (albeit fragmentary references) and more recent developments: the 2021 Joint Declaration for a Canada Free of Gender-Based Violence, signed by Canada, the provinces and the territories, leading to the 2022 National Action Plan to End Gender-Based Violence (“National Action Plan”, “NAP” or “NAPGBV”), the 2019 Final Report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous . . . [more]

Posted in: Justice Issues

3li_EnFr_Wordmark_W

This project has been made possible in part by the Government of Canada | Ce projet a été rendu possible en partie grâce au gouvernement du Canada