Canada’s online legal magazine.

Monday’s Mix

Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award­-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible.

This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. À bon droit 2. Avoid a Claim 3. Michael Geist 4. Barry Sookman 5. Eloise Gratton

À bon droit
La solution à la difficulté pour le promettant-vendeur d’intenter une action en passation de titre serait-elle l’injonction interlocutoire?

Nous avons traité ce matin des grandes difficultés qui attendent

. . . [more]
Posted in: Monday’s Mix

Imprisonment for Breach of a Court Order

It is rare that a term of imprisonment is given for breach of a Court Order, such as an injunction. The Federal Court issued an Anton Pillar order in a case of copyright infringement involving a pirate IPTV streaming service. After the persistent refusal of the defendant to comply, the Court was forced to consider a term of imprisonment as an inducement to seek compliance with its orders.

Since such enforcement action is fairly rare in copyright infringement cases, the Court reviewed the options for enforcing contempt of Court in Bell Media Inc. v. Marshall Macciacchera (Smoothstreams.tv), 2025 FC . . . [more]

Posted in: Intellectual Property

Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ

Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec.

PÉNAL (DROIT) : Lorsqu’une preuve concernant le comportement sexuel d’une victime est présentée pour la première fois en appel, la Cour doit d’abord se demander s’il est plausible que la preuve aurait été admise au terme de la procédure en 2 étapes prévue aux articles 278.93 et 278.94 C.Cr.; cela . . . [more]

Posted in: Summaries Sunday

Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners

As a supplement to our Sunday Summary each month, Supreme Advocacy LLP in Ottawa presents Supreme One-Liners, a super-short descriptive guide to the most recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers its more comprehensive weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter, summarizing all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted.

Appeals

Debtor-Creditor in Québec: Extinctive Prescription
Mohawk Council of Kanesatake v. Sylvestre, 2025 SCC 30 (41131)

Clarification of extinctive prescription in debtor-creditor context.

Leaves to Appeal

Aboriginal Law: Third Party Claims
Skii km Lax Ha, et al. v. Malii, et al., 2024 . . . [more]

Posted in: Summaries Sunday

Cough Boards and the Perils of Procedural Perfectionism

You’re running a fever and have been coughing for the past few days, so you head down to your local clinic. You wait and wait, and finally the receptionist calls your name.

Walking into the examination room, you’re surprised to see not one but three doctors. “We’re a Cough Board,” one of them says, “and we’re here to diagnose and propose treatment for you.”

You stare at them blankly for a second. But then you remember something you saw in a medical drama on TV. A “tumour board,” you recall, is a meeting of specialists convened to try to figure . . . [more]

Posted in: Legal Ethics

Book Review: How to Use Digital Learning With Confidence and Creativity: A Practical Introduction

Several times each month, we are pleased to republish a recent book review from the Canadian Law Library Review (CLLR). CLLR is the official journal of the Canadian Association of Law Libraries (CALL/ACBD), and its reviews cover both practice-oriented and academic publications related to the law.

How to Use Digital Learning with Confidence and Creativity: A Practical Introduction. Edited by Gearóid Ó Súilleabháin, Donna Lanclos & Tom Farrelly. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 2024. 362 p. Includes bibliographic references and index. ISBN 9781035311286 (hardcover) US$180.00; ISBN 9781035360543 (softcover) US$53.95; ISBN 9781035311293 (eBook) US$43.16.

Reviewed by Brianna Calomino . . . [more]

Posted in: Book Reviews, Thursday Thinkpiece

Hugh Lawford Award 2026 Nominations Open

CALL/ACBD is accepting nominations for the 2026 Hugh Lawford Award for Excellence in Legal Publishing.

The Canadian Association of Law Libraries has long had an annual award for excellent legal publishing. Some years ago, we renamed the award we present after Queens University Professor, Hugh Lawford (1933-2009) to recognize his contributions to legal publishing in Canada. As a group of legal information specialists, our work depends on being able to access and share high-quality legal knowledge.

We value innovation and this award is open to legal content in all information formats.

The award honours a publisher (whether for-profit or not-for . . . [more]

Posted in: Announcements

Quantitative Assessment of Access to Justice Initiatives

Quantitative methods are at once well-established and novel when speaking about access to justice. We’ve been reporting on our activities to funders, boards, and communities for decades, but we’ve also occasionally been complacent about what message we are conveying. When I think about data on the law and how we can approach using it better, I often think about Jon Snow and his search for the source of a cholera outbreak in London in 1854. Here you can see the original map that allowed him to identify the source as the water pump on Broad Street, which he created through . . . [more]

Posted in: Legal Information, Legal Technology

Book Review: Heenan Blaikie: The Making and Unmaking of a Great Canadian Law Firm

Earlier this year, I was invited by the Canadian Bar Review to write a review of a book by Professor Adam Dodek of the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law titled: Heenan Blaikie: The Making and Unmaking of a Great Canadian Law Firm. I found the book an excellent read and I highly recommend it. My review is included in the current issue of the CBR, now available online. I’m grateful to the Canadian Bar Review for both the opportunity to write this article and for their permission to reproduce the excerpt below.

This is a gripping account of a . . . [more]

Posted in: Practice of Law

Monday’s Mix

Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award­-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible.

This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. Administrative Law Matters 2.Litige municipal au Québec 3. Legal Sourcery 4. Canadian Appeals Monitor 5. Excess Copyright

Administrative Law Matters
Staying the Ostrich Cull

I spoke to a journalist from the Canadian Press today about Universal Ostrich Farms and the ostriches that are destined to be

. . . [more]
Posted in: Monday’s Mix

Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ

Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec.

PÉNAL (DROIT) : Dans une affaire de voies de fait graves où l’accusé, à l’aide de sa canne de métal, avait asséné un coup sur la tête de la victime afin de défendre son cousin, la conclusion de la juge de première instance, à savoir que la force utilisée était . . . [more]

Posted in: Summaries Sunday

Using Representation Pathways to Explore Court Data

Court data is an important source of information that can increase our understanding of justice system issues. Research is currently under way at Osgoode Hall Law School and the Canadian Forum on Civil Justice using Ontario court data examining two issues: the impact of unrepresented accused on the efficiency of the courts and the disadvantages that may be experienced by unrepresented accused in terms of outcomes. The research is being carried out using an appearance-based data set from the Ontario Cout of Justice. The data set includes 17,622,670 appearances nested within 2,002,306 disposed cases from 2011 to 2022.

Court data . . . [more]

Posted in: Justice Issues

3li_EnFr_Wordmark_W

This project has been made possible in part by the Government of Canada | Ce projet a été rendu possible en partie grâce au gouvernement du Canada