A Sentence to Go “Home”
The bar has often lamented the lack of “plain language” by the bench, a necessary prerequisite for transparency and open access to the public.
At times, the need for this approach has been criticized as overlooking the needs of the parties. Sometimes, like in the Meads case, this approach is intended to address broader, systemic problems. As I told Canadian Lawyer Magazine a few years ago,
. . . [more]“I think the fact that the judge even made this ruling suggests how big a problem it is,” says Toronto lawyer Omar Ha-Redeye. “This is a hot issue. Family law is in crisis
