At the beginning of each month, we tell you which three English-language cases and French-language cases have been the most viewed* on CanLII in the previous month and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about.

For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were:

1. Veerasingam v. Licence Appeal Tribunal, 2024 ONSC 3730

[2] Many lawyers graduate from law school thinking that their cases will be won with erudite advocacy concerning esoteric questions of complex jurisprudence intertwined with contemporary ideals of public policy reform.

[3] But as every experienced advocate understands, the reality of . . . [more]

On August 17, 2014, fifteen-year-old Tina Fontaine was found dead in Winnipeg’s Red River. It had been over two weeks since Tina was reported missing. Among the more disturbing details of Tina’s death was the fact that in the twenty-four hours prior to her disappearance, she had been seen by child welfare workers, healthcare professionals, and police officers. How did a system that is purportedly built to protect Canada’s most vulnerable fail Tina at every step? As a member of Sagkeeng First Nation, Tina’s story is not only part of the humanitarian crisis of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women . . . [more]

Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec.

PÉNAL (DROIT) : La Cour rejette l’appel d’un jugement ayant déclaré l’accusé coupable de possession de drogues en vue d’en faire le trafic et de possession de produits de la criminalité après que la requête en exclusion de la preuve présentée par l’accusé eut été rejetée par le juge de . . . [more]

Whether a restrictive covenant, like a non-compete clause, is enforceable depends on the context. In Dr. C. Sims Dentistry Professional Corporation v. Cooke, 2024 ONCA 388, Justice van Rensburg of the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s decision to enforce the restrictive covenants placed on a dentist after he sold his practice. 

In her reasons, Justice van Rensburg notes that courts will give more scrutiny to the reasonableness of a restrictive covenant in the employment context. Conversely, when looking at restrictive covenants in the context of a sale of a business, courts will apply the presumption . . . [more]

Justice Jamal and the Supreme Court deserve passing marks for their transparency in addressing the request by the Quebec Government that the judge recuse himself in Quebec Secularism Law (Bill 21) case. This is in sharp contrast to the “F” that almost every commentator would give the high court for its dealings with the complaint against Justice Russell Brown in 2023 (see for example this scathing critique from Professor Geoff Sigalet).

Just to remind readers, the Supreme Court’s strategy in that instance was to say nothing and hope no one noticed that Justice Brown did not sit on any cases . . . [more]

If you need to research legislation in British Columbia, Gail Nash’s publication Legislation Made Easy has now been made freely available on BC Laws. 

This publication, well known to law librarians, is “a guide to the complexities of the various aspects of statutes, regulations and orders.” It covers such things as the legislative process, how bills, regulations and orders come into force (along with helpful flowcharts) along with some helpful definitions.

— Susannah Tredwell . . . [more]

One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers a weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter, to which you may subscribe. It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from June 21 – July 25, 2024 inclusive.

Appeals

Administrative/Labour Law: Standard of Review; Grievances Arbitration
York Region District School Board v. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario, 2022 ONCA 476; 2024 SCC 22 (40360)

This appeal provides an opportunity for the S.C.C. to determine the applicability . . . [more]

Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec.

PÉNAL (DROIT) : Les 2 coaccusés, des ex-joueurs des Tigres de la Ligue de hockey junior majeur du Québec, sont condamnés à des peines de pénitencier pour avoir agressé sexuellement la victime alors que celle-ci était âgée de 17 ans.

Intitulé : R. c. Daigle, 2024 QCCQ 3083 *
Juridiction . . . [more]

“Jury Duty” is a courtroom spoof-comedy reality show where the only victim is Ronald Gladden, who thinks he’s going to be a juror. Ronald is “picked” as a juror in a civil trial, except he is the only one who isn’t in on the theme of the show. The judge, counsel, fellow jurors, and witnesses are all actors, but Ronald is not. In one scene, the competent plaintiff’s counsel presents a kind of virtual reality reenactment of the scene which is the subject of the civil litigation, and it truly impresses the jurors. The bumbling counsel for the defense does . . . [more]

For decades, the ideas of equality, justice, and human rights have been the core pillars of Canada’s national identity. However, the reality embedded within our criminal justice system creates a significant obstacle to the actualization of those ideas. Overrepresentation of Indigenous and Black individuals in Canadian jails and prisons, and systemic racism in the criminal justice system, have been well documented in numerous studies and inquiries.[1] The Ontario Court of Appeal acknowledged this systemic issue over thirty years ago in R v Parks, 1993 CanLII 3383. This necessitates a pressing reconsideration of the “public interest” test used . . . [more]